Social And Economic Policy Decisions Impact Income Equality

Social and economic policy decisions impact income equality, which has an effect on the health of Canadians. Those with lower incomes are directly affected while income inequality affects the health of all Canadians through weakening of social structure (Raphael, 2002). Contrary to reports of rising net worth, a new report has been released by an Ottawa-based think tank to show Canada’s inequality problem. The top 10 percent of Canadians have seen their net worth grow by 42% since 2005 to 2.1 million in 2012. However, the bottom 10 percent saw their net worth shrink by 150 percent (Flavelle, 2014). With this new report, it challenges the idea that suggests Canadians are getting wealthier laterally (Flavelle, 2014). This paper will examine†¦show more content†¦For example, the reduction of deaths from infectious diseases such as influenza, diphtheria and typhoid were due to improvements in general living conditions rather than medical cures (Raphael, 2002) It is hypot hesized that lifestyle differences are the reasons for the incidence of stroke, heart disease and cancer. Health and Poverty Vulnerable populations including immigrants, Aboriginal peoples, single parent families and the elderly make up a growing percentage of the lower extreme of the socioeconomic scale (Turnbull, J. Podymow T, 2002). While we are quick to consider the costs of aiding the poor, we rarely consider the costs that poverty and income inequality inflict on our society. To achieve improved health, it is critical to improve income security through good jobs, income supports and fairer taxes (Barnes et al., 2013). There are two broad strategies that focus on alleviating the effects of poverty on health: 1) directly reducing poverty and socio-economic inequality 2) intervening in pathways connecting poverty and health. These interventions have been identified as upstream and downstream. Downstream policies refer to those that have an explicit health purpose and tend to be targeted at those that are already suffering from increased health risk, while upstream refers to the wider influences on health inequalities such as income distribution, education and housing. While these approaches fall

Drug Cartel - 2623 Words

Ciudad Juarez is known as one of the most violent cities in Mexico. The drug cartels have taken over the city and have continued to control the city. The city officials have been defeated over and over again; hopeless they still search for new ways to win this ongoing war. Using technology in the United States has become a crucial part of its survival, since our failure to use intelligence properly in the attack of nine-eleven. Mexico is now attempting to use use the same method in hope that they can be steps ahead of the cartel to ensure success. The Drug Cartels are very violent organizations in Mexico. Between December 2006 and December 2010, there were more than 30,000 deaths in the country. The Cartels in Mexico have†¦show more content†¦He has deployed 45,000 members of his military and 5,000 federal police to fight drug traffickers. In order to remove all corruption means firing of government employees who are corrupt or not willing to do their task. The government would have to place hundreds and even thousands of police in jail. For more than a century United States and Mexico have enjoyed friendly relations and some degree of integration. Mexico is now in the middle of a vicious drug war. Police are being bribed and in the United States border, gunned down. Kidnapping and extortion are common place. The Pentagon study concludes that Mexico is at risk of becoming a failed state. Defense planners have compared the Mexico situation to that of Pakistan, where the collapse of the civil government is possible. United States will place military and declare Marshall Law if the violence of Mexico spills over into the United States borders. For this reason, Department of Defense are using the radar software tools are for legal crime-fighting purposes, keeping Mexico â€Å"at the forefront of technological advances.† (El Universal) Mexico has been supported by the United States to install up to 107 monitoring stations for wiretapping communications nationwide. Mexico has their current contracts â€Å"h idden,† they have been criticized for not providing theShow MoreRelatedDrug Cartel : Drug Cartels1688 Words   |  7 PagesDrug Cartel in Mexico Drug cartels have been an issue for Mexico over a century now, according to Congressional Research Service. This issue had led to assassination against innocent people, many individuals have been threaten, murdered and even kidnapped. In the year of 1940, Mexico was a big source of marijuana and heroin which created these big Drug trafficking organizations that still exist today for example; in Tijuana, MX â€Å"The Arellano Felix Organization†, Sinaloa, MX â€Å"Cartel Del Chapo†, â€Å"LosRead MoreThe Medellin Drug Cartel : Background1691 Words   |  7 PagesThe Medellin Drug Cartel BACKGROUND Drug cartels have grown and expanded throughout the interior and exterior of states for many years. The way drugs started to be introduced to Mexico, Colombia, and other places around the world was believed to be a myth. It was a tale that was known by many through storytelling, which over the years turned into an actual realistic issue. One of the most known cartels that existed for a long time was The Medellin Cartel. It became a subculture of its ownRead MoreDrug World Organizations: Drug Cartels1436 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"The drug world organization is fundamentally gendered† (Anderson 2005). Anderson has continuously insisted that the illicit drug world, based on a patriarchally organized hierarchy where men continue to dominate, is also one that cannot exist without womens empowerment and agency. It is then critical to concentrate on the complex interplay between men and women. There are numerous ways in which women on the border between the United States a nd Mexico become involved in crime and the illicit drugRead MoreDrug Cartel Control in Columbia867 Words   |  3 PagesThe situation between government agencies and the drug cartels in Mexico is similar to the one in Colombia 20 years ago. As I have previously said, throughout the 1990s the Cali and Medellin drug cartels dominated the world cocaine trade. Both cartels were made up of several different drug-trafficking organizations, each containing its own specific organizational structure. These cartels hid their cocaine production labs in remote, jungle regions, where Colombian insurgent groups provided them coverRead MoreMexicos Drug Cartel Violence Problem1861 Words   |  8 PagesThe United States role with Mexico’s drug cartel violence problem has been of ongoing help. The cartels are unabashed in trying to continue to run their drug smuggling operations. The Mexican people have had to endure a high number of homicides in their country. Some of these people killed we re innocents who were at the wrong place at the wrong time. Many of the homicides were intentional as drug cartels often send messages to people warning others not to interfere in their businesses. Mexican lawRead MoreThe Cartel : A Powerful Drug Trafficking Organization1783 Words   |  8 Pagesborders which is drug smuggling. In the region of North America lies a state that faces struggles everyday with a organization called Sinaloa Cartel. They face battles against this organization for control of the drug market within the state. This cartel plays a huge role within the state by having a huge influence in power compared to other the organizations in the state. The Sinaloa cartel was founded in 1989 which have their base location in the city of Culiacà ¡n, Sinaloa. The cartel is consideredRead MoreDrug Cartel Violence And Mexico1616 Words   |  7 PagesI told you the drug cartel violence in Mexico is still one of the largest drug distributions in the world. The drug cartel violences taking place in Mexico have been going on for many years now and nobody has really tried to put a stop to it. Although Mexican drug cartels have existed for several decades, their influences have increased. Mexican drug cartels now dominate the wholesale illegal drug market. Arrests of key cartel leaders have led to increasing drug violence as cartels fight for controlRead MoreEvolving Structure of Mexican Drug Cartels1494 Words   |  6 Pagespayment for the protection of the womans local business against the Juarez Cartel. (Lacey, M. 2010). Many critics are now making comparisons between the Mexican drug cartels, like the one mentioned above, and legitimate corporations like Netflix, or Google. There are currently seven major Mexican drug cartels. Although, the cartels may all come from different backgrounds and have different approaches towards trafficking drugs, they all share a similar business style structure to their organizationsRead MoreDrug Cartels : Mexico And The Brutal War Of Drug Trafficking1299 Words   |  6 PagesOdden Am/Lit December 18th, 2015 Drug Cartels Mexico is known for many things ranging from there beautiful coastlines to there ancient ruins and museums to the brutal war of drug trafficking. The drug war in Mexico is one of the biggest events in narcotics history. Drug trafficking was best known in Michoacan, Guanajuato and Guerrero but it has recently spread across all of Mexico. Michoacan was the first place where it erupted due to an organization of cartels known as La Familia. Mexico was onceRead MoreThe Fight Against Mexican Drug Cartels1743 Words   |  7 PagesThe Uphill Battle Against Mexican Drug Cartels â€Å"Drugs continue to kill †¦ 200,000 people a year, shattering families and bringing misery to thousands† states Yury Fedotov, the Executive Director of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UN 2012). A modern crisis, drug abuse takes the will and freedom of hundreds of thousands, plunging their lives into despair. But this is only one side of the coin; those who supply the hazardous euphoria of drugs build their own volatile empires on foundations of violence

Political Campaign Funding Essay Example For Students

Political Campaign Funding Essay No matter what your social issue, if you want to solve it get the money outof politics. Only then will lawmakers vote for their people rather than theirpocketbooks. Jack E. Lohman. Money corrupts politics, and when contributionsare being made to candidates it is not in the best interest of the Americanpeople. Campaign Finance is out of control in todays political races. Candidates are taking money from wherever and whoever they can get it. Softmoney is flowing through elections without care or caution. People who makethese contributions do not share the views of the average citizen, sopoliticians end up representing the wrong people. Money decides races, sometimesleaving the better man but lighter spender out of a position. Candidates makedecisions based on what will help them financially that what is better for thepeople. Contributions by industry are made not in the interest of the people,sometimes hurting them in ways they dont even know. No matter what theopposition may say campaign finance reform is needed urgently to keep ourdemocracy as our founders intended it. People and corporations that make thelargest donations to campaigns do not share views with the general population. Politicians will listen to those who give them money so that they can depend onthat money being there again when it is time for reelection. Yet individualdonors making a $200 dollar or more contribution make up only .33% of thepopulation. This extremely small percentage of mostly wealthy individuals gainthe power to influence politicians to their liking. The idea that these peopleshould have power to affect government more than those with less money goesagainst the concept of equality for all, which is what made this country great. People who make large donations do not share the same views on most issues asthe general population. Robert L. Borosage and Ruy Teixeira report that while 53percent of voters want stricter regulations on businesses and corporations, togive workers a fair salary and working conditions, 58 percent of campaign donorswant to see less control over the businesses and corporations of America. Donorsalso want less government spending with lower taxes, while the majority ofcitizens want a larger, more powerful government. A very tiny part of ourpopulation is giving money to campaigns telling candidates what they have to doto continue getting campaign contributions, yet these people do not representthe ideology and sentiment of the people as a whole. There must be a change inthe way that campaigns are financed if democracy is to survive. If we do notreform campaign finance we will have politicians working only for those who canafford to contribute. Money is the major factor in any political ra ce. It cansway a decision very strongly depending on how well it is used. In the House,the candidate who spends the most money on his or her campaign wins 92% of thetime. Things are no different in the Senate, here 88% of the time the biggerspender wins. Incumbents are usually the tip money spender, because they raisemore money. Paul Starr, writer for The American Prospect , estimates that itwould take $1,000,000 for a challenger to defeat the incumbent. The only way achallenger could get this kind of money would be to appeal to big business andthe wealthy, who have radically different ideas about government than thegeneral public. A challenger, to even have a chance, would have to turn tobusiness and wealth to win. With this great difficulty to de-seat an incumbent,turnover in congress drops, and members become stagnant, winning on name alone. All the while, they are giving breaks to the corporations and wealthy people whogot them there. With campaigns finance reform, we could get challengers andincumbents on a level playing field so that the candidate with the better ideaswho will honestly help the majority will end up the victor. It would not mattermuch where candidates got the money from for their campaigns except that whenelected, politicians act on in accordance to the wishes of those who have madedonations. 71% of citizens say that a politicians choices and votes are made onthe basis of money. 61% of donors agree with this. Its been explained that asmall percentage of people make donations, and these people do not represent thepopulation as a whole. If politicians make decisions based on this small groupof people they are not representing the entire population ,or doing what is bestfor the majority, as they were hired to do. Politicians realize where they getfunding and work to please those with the money. Robert Rei ch estimates thathalf of all Americans with a million dollar a year income or greater have hadtheir picture taken with the president. All this attention is going to a groupthat consists of less than 90,000. This cannot be healthy for a government thatis supposed to work for all Americans. When congress persons make decisionsbased on whether it will fill their campaign fund, it is not representative ofthe people that they should be representing. The decisions that they make may beharmful to the people, but that does not matter to some politicians. All thatmatter to them is dollars. The people dont know this though because thosedollars are spent trying to convince everyone that their representative did agood job and worked for their best interest. Money does matter to politiciansand they remember and reward those who get them into office. Donations made bycorporations often hurt individuals either financially or even medically. .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 , .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 .postImageUrl , .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 , .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6:hover , .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6:visited , .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6:active { border:0!important; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6:active , .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6 .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u69aa0dc23ab830b42fabfb33e4f8ede6:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Essay on The Atomic Bomb EssayCorporations make up a large portion of the groups that give generous donations. These corporations do not care what is good for the people, all they care aboutis their own bottom line. If this means shipping unsafe or unhealthy products,that is what will be done. Food companies have donated $41 million dollars onthe promise by candidates, that once in office, will not make stricterregulations on e-coli protection. E-coli is a deadly bacteria that infectsnumerous people every year. But as a result of donations by food companies, governmentwill not regulate these companies to protect Americans. Food companies are notalone, the cotton industry is also at fault. Safety standards that somecompanies include on night wear voluntarily because of the great risk of burns,are not national law. The cotton industry gives generous contributions toCongress in hopes that any legislation concerning safety standards will be shutdown. These are safety standards that have already saved dozens of lives andcould save many more. Campaign money from industries stops laws that would hel pout every American. New drugs are released into the market for public useeveryday. The company that originated the drug holds a patent on that drug foran amount of time, after this time any company can make this drug and offer itat a competitive price. Competitive prices would be of great help to those whoare on a fixed income, such as the elderly population, and cannot afford thehigh price of medications. Contributions of !8.4 million going to campaigns and8.4 million in soft money from medicine developing companies have influencedpoliticians to lengthen the amount of time that patents on drugs last, costingAmericans millions. These are just three examples of how industries hurt thepeople of America by donating to campaigns. There are many more hurting averagecitizens everyday, without them even knowing it. In the end taxpayer pay forthese contributions that hurt them so much anyway. When a large business makes adonation, they must make up for the lost money. They do this by raisi ng theprices that they charge consumers. Congress gives the contributions back tocompanies through corporate welfare. 167 billion dollars a year is given tocompanies that donated to campaigns. This money has to come from somewhere. Itcomes from the taxes every year of John Q. Public. So we are not only payinghigher prices as a result of campaign contributions, but we are paying thecorporations again through corporate welfare. Consumer safety is commonlyignored because of special interest industries. Higher prices are put upon us athe cash register every time we buy something from a company that fundscampaigns. Taxes are high because of corporate welfare. Reform is needed to saveAmericans from this kind of treatment from the big businesses. Opponents ofCampaign finance reform have many reasons that they feel reform is bad. But mostof these arguments boil down to; contributions are an expression of freedom ofspeech, and reform would not help as illegal contributions take place now and would only be increased with more laws. The voices of those who fundadvertisements that do not go on campaign reports are those of a small minority. These voices are being heard above all the voices of the greater majority ofpeople who cannot afford to have their voices heard. Letting one persons opinionbe louder than another goes against the ideas of equality for all, infringingupon the rights of others. If reform is to take place we must enforce the lawsthat we set in place. Laws that are not enforced are worthless. We must be readyto punish a candidate and make him or her face the consequences, whether it beelimination from the race or removal from office. Reform is needed to fix ourcrooked and corrupt congress, and we must be willing to punish those who breakthe law. One option that we should consider is that of Jack E. Lohman, abusiness man from Milwaukee, WI. Under his plan special interest and corporatedonations would be eliminated. Instead, taxpayers would fund politicalcampaigns. Special interests and corporations spend 750 million on campaigns. Asit was explained, this hurts taxpayers when purchasing goods and when payi ngtaxes for corporate welfare. By eliminating these donors politicians would notbe affected by outside interests and would be free to do what is best for thepeople. The 750 million dollars for campaigns would come from the taxpayers andonly cost $5 dollars a year. After cuts from corporate welfare and wastefulgovernment spending this would save taxpayers 495 to 995 dollars a year, not tomention price drops as a result of reduced corporate spending on politicalcampaigns. This would put more money in the hands of the taxpayer to buy moreproducts helping the economy. Most important, politicians would not be swayed bymonetary interest offered to them for help in other areas. Donors notrepresenting the public, money, not people and issues deciding races,politicians voting for campaign funds instead of the public, corporationsrisking the safety of people, these are all problems that could be fixed byreforming campaign finance. Campaign finance is an urgent problem that must beremedied soo n or we will be facing a situation in government where the powerlies in the hand of those who have money to donate to campaigns. If something isnot done we will be heading straight into a corrupt and contemptible governmentwhose only care is that of being reelected. Action must be taken now before itis too late and scandalous congressmen will only support scandalous policy. Ifour government is to be saved, we must have campaign finance reform.

Parallax One Is 1 Year Old! Heres a Gallery of User Sites Built With It

Parallax One is now 1 year old, which gives us a perfect occasion to celebrate!Just to remind you, Parallax One was  our first-ever  fully fledged theme (no features locked) that was made available for free, and never released to the official directory at WordPress.org. To learn more about the launch process of the theme, check out Ionuts Transparency Report #6.Long story short, Parallax One has been a great learning experience for us, and also quite a success in testing how far we can go by experimenting with independent promotion channels.So, to celebrate Parallax One being 1 year old, weve decided to reach out to our users thats you and invite them to submit the websites theyve built with Parallax One, and get them showcased on our blog.Without further ado, the day has come. Weve looked through all the submissions and chosen 9  implementations of Parallax One that we think stand out from the others. Type of business Language Unique elementsContrada  Bricconi Farm startup IT Great original imagery, multi-column pagesWelcome to Ukraine Facts about Ukraine EN Wide header image creating a nice vibeSignaling System Solutions Fire safety business EN Minimal design with consistent homepage elements that fit togetherFraser Marlow Personal resume EN Creative use of the header graphic and menu structureChico Vintage Nights Vintage event business EN Great vintage imagery and overall old-school design feelHenry Miller Museum RSVP museum website EN Huge header with clear purpose, strengthening the site goalKovka Artistic metal forging RU Dark color scheme showcase, climatic header graphic and typographyOkay, that sums up our  Parallax One showcase!Found your site here? Share this post and brag about it!